Our Story

We are a Public Housing Authority. We were created to provide housing for U.S. citizens in Osceola, Arkansas. We were the twenty-first Public Housing Authority created and developed in Arkansas. We are, in terms of public housing units the eleventh largest Housing Authority in the state.

We expanded and evolved from the first two neighborhoods, Hyatt and Northgate (Bronx and Rosenwald) which were developed in the first part of the 1960’s to four neighborhoods with the development of Eastgate in the mid 1960’s and then Shirley Drive and Chestnut Circle in the early 1970’s. East Hale, our adults neighborhood was also developed in the early 1970’s.

We lease and manage 355 units of housing in four separate neighborhoods covering more than 40 acres of land. With an average resident population of 750, we provide homes for approximately 10% of Osceola’s total population. Our residents work in restaurants, factories, health-care organizations and myriad other businesses in the Osceola and greater Mississippi County area. They attend schools and churches in Osceola; they shop at local businesses, use local services and contribute in the same way, to the economy, health and vitality of the City that every other citizen does.

OHA’s day-to-day and long-term operations and planning are the responsibility of a staff of fourteen full-time employees. Nine employees are in the Maintenance Department; five are in the Administrative Department. Six of our staff are OHA residents, up from zero in early 2013. We also have a long-time resident serving on OHA’s Board of Commissioners. Speaking of Commissioners, OHA’s operations and planning are governed and guided by a five-member Board of Commissioners. The five Commissioners, all volunteers, meet monthly to review and monitor agency finances, planning and overall performance. Although the agency keeps fairly typical business hours, we are, in fact available and on-call 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. You can contact us here [link to contact info].

Our History
THE EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC HOUSING


As the Great Depression deepened in the early 1930’s, President Roosevelt, along with Congress enacted a sweeping set of initiatives to combat the many ills of the Depression, popularly known as the New Deal. One of the many agencies created to combat rampant unemployment and suffering, and generate economic recovery was the Public Works Administration, or PWA. The National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 directed the PWA to develop a Housing Division, that would create a program for the “construction, reconstruction, alteration, or repair under public regulation or control of low-cost housing and slum clearance projects…” by providing provide low-interest loans to public or private groups to fund the construction of low-income housing (the first LHA’s, or Local Housing Agencies). A novel and ground-breaking concept; but too few qualified applicants took advantage of the program.

This led, in turn to the PWA Administrator, via the mandate of the 1934 National Housing Act directing the PWA Housing Division to construct public housing on its own, which led to the development, between 1934 and 1937 of 52 publicly funded housing agencies across the U.S., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. It also was the basis in part for the Housing Act of 1937, which established publicly-funded low-income housing as a permanent Federal program. That program was the responsibility of the United States Housing Authority (USHA), which was created as part of the 1937 Act to manage subsidies to local agencies for an initial period of two years. The USHA replaced the temporary PWA Housing Division, and oversaw a significant increase in the annual housing units developed.

As part of President Truman’s Fair Deal package, The Housing Act of 1949, among other housing stimulus and financing elements set as a goal the construction of 810,000 public housing units in ten years.

THE EVOLUTION OF OSCEOLA HOUSING AUTHORITY

As for Osceola Housing Authority – it began as a plan for public housing development in the City between two entities; the Osceola Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and the City of Osceola. On July 9, 1958 the two entities signed a Cooperative Agreement as a local housing agency that defined the development and financial operation of the Housing Authority of the City of Osceola, its official title.

The Agreement allowed for the pursuit of funding through the USHA and/or other venues, and specified an initial development of approximately 150 housing units.
On ____________ Osceola Housing Authority executed an Annual Contributions Contract (ACC) with ___________ to provide funding for the development envisioned in the Cooperative Agreement. Planning got underway almost immediately.

Since an important element of the national drive to establish publicly-funded housing was the elimination of slums, the Agreement envisioned goals for replacement of “…insanitary housing…” with safe, clean, sanitary and affordable housing for low-income families and individuals, which were documented throughout development and construction.

The first development included the Hyatt (Bronx) and Northgate (Rosenwald) neighborhoods. The Hyatt included 60 residences in single-story duplex buildings, in a quiet, semi-private and distinct neighborhood. The Northgate included 86 residences, again in a quiet, semi-private and distinct neighborhood setting.

The design of each neighborhood was in direct and stark contrast to the prevailing design concepts for public housing. Featuring large common and play areas, large residence lots and the potential (realized over time) for mature trees and landscaping, they both represented an advancement in public housing development theory.
Construction initiated in 1960 and completed in 1962, although demand was strong enough that occupancy began some time before completion.

Development and expansion continued. In 1964, ground was broken for the Eastgate neighborhood (70 residences) and the Northgate Addition (30 residences), which created Nickerson and Childress Circles and adjoined the Northgate neighborhood. In 1970, construction began on the Shirley Drive and Chestnut Circle neighborhood (50 residences) and the Eastgate Addition (41 residences), which expanded the Eastgate neighborhood north on Broadway to Semmes. Finally, the East Hale neighborhood (20 units) was developed at the east end of Hale Avenue in the mid 1970’s, bringing OHA to a total of 355 residences under lease.
East Hale neighborhood was converted to an Adult Enclave (55 years and older) in late 2013.
OHA’s Administration office was originally sited in the Hyatt neighborhood. In 2010 all administrative functions were relocated to the new Administration building in the Northgate neighborhood.

What We Are

We are a not-for-profit entity regulated by all relevant State and Federal Rules [link to The Rules That Guide Us] that govern any like organization.
We are a public entity, which means that our Commission and Planning Meetings are open, subject to certain confidentiality privileges; we are subject to and compliant with Freedom of Information Act requests; and, as a federally subsidized organization, we must comply with regulations regarding bidding, contract awards, procurement and other activities that include expenditure or commitment of federal funds.

We are expected to operate and maintain our business exclusively on our revenues and federal funds.

We are a significant and constructive member of the larger community that is the City of Osceola. We are a consumer of the City’s resources and, at the same time a contributor to its economy and vitality, just as with any other community within the City. In recognition of those two facts, what we WANT to be “What We Are”, in all possible aspects is a net contributor to the City’s, and the larger region’s economy and vitality.
We are not a Section 8/Housing Choice Voucher/”HUD” housing provider. We are not emergency housing providers. We are a Public Housing Authority.

The Rules That Guide Us

We are a Public Housing Authority. We receive federal funds, in the form of operating subsidies and modernization grants to operate, maintain and improve our housing portfolio, as well as our physical operating plant. These funds derive from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

As such, we are, in addition to being governed by all relevant Local, State and Federal laws and regulations, responsible for adhering to a broad and comprehensive set of Federal regulations that are specific to publicly funded low-income housing.

Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (most often referred to as “24 CFR”) is the source of those regulations. So; to navigate to the most relevant regulations one would look for: 24 CFR Subtitle B, Chapter IX, Parts 900 through 970. You can find it here:
GPO – 2015 24 CFR Subtitle B, Chapter IX, Parts 900 through 970
You can also find information about and links to these regulations at HUD’s website:
HUD – Code of Federal Regulations Applicable to Programs Administered by Public and Indian Housing

Within Chapter IX, Parts 960 through 966 are perhaps most relevant to applicants, and current and former residents. These parts define the following activities, policies and processes:

  • Part 960 – Admission To, and Occupancy of, Public Housing
  • Part 963 - Public Housing Contracting With Resident-Owned Businesses
  • Part 964 - Tenant Participation and Tenant Opportunities in Public Housing (if you are interested in this, please call me! – Rob Collins)
  • Part 965 - Public Housing Authority-Owned or –Leased Projects – General Provisions
  • Part 966 - Public Housing Lease and Grievance Procedure

We depend on and are very responsive to both explicit and implicit guidance gained during our frequent interactions with HUD’s area Field Office (we just call it “HUD Little Rock”), which is a part of HUD’s Region VI, headquarters in Ft. Worth, TX. If you need to contact HUD Little Rock, you can find the information here, on HUD’s website:

HUD – Contact Local Arkansas Offices

Finally, and most significantly, we are guided by the oversight and input from our Board of Commissioners. Look at it like this:

  • HUD Washington provides the highest level guidance in the form of regulations and myriad other methods. They control and guide the entire architecture of Public Housing programs at a national level. That’s the level at which HUD Washington operates. These inputs, along with all the other Federal law and regulations are our “high-altitude” guidance.
  • HUD Little Rock takes that guidance and adds a layer of insight and nuance that takes into account the actualities of our region. They must not only be cognizant of all high-altitude guidance but also be able to apply regional realities to that guidance when appropriate or necessary. That’s the level at which HUD Little Rock operates. These additional inputs, along with all the State laws and regulations are our “mid-altitude” guidance.
  • OHA’s Board of Commissioners provides our “wheels-on-the-ground altitude” guidance. All five current Commissioners are long- or lifetime citizens of Osceola. One Commissioner is a 10+ year OHA resident. They know the area; in many cases, they know the residents personally. The Commission’s guidance adds a final, critical organization-level insight that helps contextualize and localize OHA’s implementation of guidance, policies and operations; indeed, often, the Commission’s guidance “humanizes” how OHA implements guidance and policies and how we operate.

All of this, then represents the total amount of directive, guidance and other inputs that, when taken together can be called the rules that guide us.

Our continuing job is to receive and comprehend all that input, and to synthesize it into a coherent, compliant operating philosophy that accommodates the needs of our residents in both the short and long term.

Our Mission

We are a Public Housing Authority. Our mission is to provide the highest quality housing possible to those who have a need and qualify. In a larger sense, we work to be one of many things that help those that live with us progress towards their personal life goals; our part in that is to ensure that they have a clean, safe, highly sustainable home in a good environment with excellent support services, all of which are focused on helping them on their path.
By doing that consistently and well, we further the goals of the American public, our ultimate employer.

What We Do
How We Help

We are a Public Housing Authority. So, first and foremost, we help by providing safe, sanitary, highly efficient and respectable housing for low- and very-low income U.S. citizens who choose to reside in the City of Osceola. We prioritize our efforts to provide housing to working families and individuals, a group that comprises over 50% of our households; and to the elderly and disabled, a group that comprises a significant number of that remaining 50% of households. This latter group most often relies on a fixed income; all our residents are helped by the availability of the housing we provide, which offers an affordable option to the broader area rental market. Using our monthly Operating Budget funding, we partially subsidize our rents, allowing our residents to control their housing costs and thus more ably manage their other financial and life responsibilities.

There is another way we help. It isn’t policy so much as an organizational philosophy. We provide an opportunity for citizens to access “but-for” housing. That means that, for a not-insignificant fraction of the low-income population of Osceola, but for us and the housing opportunities we offer, there would be no other realistic, let alone high-quality housing options available to them. One important part of that: we have as residents a large number of young adults who, but for us would not have that opportunity to get that first place of their own. This means they are also learning for the first time how to manage their independent lives, often on limited means, which often stem from their first forays into participating in the employment economy. Which means learning to budget, to manage transportation and a household and to function as an adult part of a community. We help with all that for as long as they live with us. As importantly, we help by providing quality homes for our elderly and disabled residents, along with all the support services – maintenance and repair, landscaping and grounds maintenances, and full administrative services – so that they can maximize the quality of their independent lives in a setting that they would probably not otherwise find available on the broader rental market. But for us, those opportunities just wouldn’t be available.

Finally – another part of our organizational philosophy is to be respectful of our ability, and obligation to help by providing that often critical second chance housing opportunity to those who may have faltered in the past.
Public housing is most often, and rightly perceived as a “stepping stone”; a waypoint on the path towards self-sufficiency, fulfillment and empowerment. Many times, however we also offer that “step back up” onto the path for those who may have experienced setbacks or hardships that make it difficult to secure housing on the broader rental market. We help by providing a safe base from which to find and get back on that path for those who are sincere about doing so.

How We Operate and Why

We are a Public Housing Authority. At the same time, we are a not-for-profit business. We serve an important public good; and yet, we must balance our desire to altruistically serve that good with our responsibility to our bottom-line imperative.
The operation of OHA is subject to numerous performance measurements. These measurements allow HUD to quantify the effectiveness of our operations in order to judge the health and wellbeing of the organization as a going concern. These measurements include:

  • Occupancy levels on a monthly basis
  • Physical condition of the Housing Authority including residences, grounds and support infrastructure
  • Financial condition of the Housing Authority and adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
  • Timely capital funds placement for renovations and modernization activities
    So, we conduct our operations in a way that allows us to achieve the highest possible results from these measurements, which in turn focuses us on providing the best possible services and accommodations to and for our residents. Here’s how we do it:
  • Every staff member at OHA places a high priority on maintaining maximum levels of occupancy. OHA’s occupancy measurement is rated at the end of each calendar month. In order to achieve the best possible result, we need to end each month with 98% of our active housing portfolio occupied. That means only seven out of our 355 residences can be vacant at the end of any given month. So, our operations meld two distinct but entirely interrelated efforts each month: 1) Maintenance identifies and, in conjunction with Administration prioritizes vacant units for “make-ready” work – the work required to return vacant units to lease-ready condition, and then does all that work; 2) Administration, in conjunction with Maintenance identifies applicants for lease-ready vacant units and does all the work necessary to get them moved in and occupying those units. Our goal, which we achieve consistently is to have a 100% occupancy measurement result at the end of each month.
  • OHA is a large enterprise, physically speaking. You can see some physical characteristics data here. We have 187 buildings spread across four neighborhoods encompassing over 42 acres of land. Many of these structures are over 50 years old. They are, almost without exception in continual use. We use our annual capital grant funds to do physical improvement work that significantly extends the useful life of these physical assets. But as with any large physical plant, we are constantly working to counteract the effects of wear and tear, and to keep the entire physical plant operating smoothly, efficiently and safely. To achieve that result, we have 14 Maintenance staff whose daily operations are geared towards not only keeping active units available for lease, but to maintaining the physical integrity of the organization.
  • Strong financial stewardship is key to ensuring that we maximize all available income and revenues so they can be best deployed towards meeting all of our operational needs. Our operations are geared towards dedicating the maximum amount of funding possible to meeting the needs of our residents, and; maintaining our physical plant; while controlling our overhead expenses, and minimizing debts and receivables. All this must be done with complete transparency, and is subject to continual monitoring and oversight, independent audit and review and approval by HUD.
  • Capital fund grants are made available to eligible Housing Authorities on an annual basis. They are intended to conduct development, renovation and modernization work that significantly improves and/or extends the useful life of the Authority’s housing portfolio and the larger physical plant. This is as opposed to Operating funds, which support day-to-day repair and maintenance activities. HUD expects that funds allocated under the Capital Fund Program (CFP) to be used quickly and efficiently to achieve those useful life extension objectives. In order to do that, we must maintain an annual plan (see here) that is a part of a longer-term five-year plan that outlines how these funds will be allocated and used, and how those uses will further the goals of HUD and the Housing Authority. Our operations are geared towards proactively creating and implementing actionable projects based on the planning activities outlined in the annual and five-year plans. We begin committing funds within weeks, not months or years, of the notice of availability; we select and use responsible, experienced contractors to do the work. Our operational goal, in order to achieve the highest possible result is to have all capital funds expended and accounted for within 12 months of availability.
Why We Are Needed

This question is possibly the easiest, or at least the most straightforward one to answer of all. There are numerous studies and other investigations showing the need for affordable, low-income housing (just look here). At the end of the day though, we are needed, quite simply, because the American people have decided – repeatedly – that access to high-quality, affordable housing for those among us who need it most, is something upon which our society places much value. It is something that the American people have voted to fund and support, time and time again. It is one of our ideals as a society.
Osceola Housing Authority is a physical manifestation of that public value. We serve the housing needs of low-income citizens in order to fulfill the will of the American people. That is why we are needed.
On a personal note: we are also desperately needed as a safe, stable, affordable and secure housing option for low-income, young adult parents, and especially their children.